Saturday, July 31, 2004

[news] Cognizant & the "Intelligent Internet" + a Peek at 2005 IT Budgets (Part 1 of 2)

Thursday, July 29, 2004
Dateline: China
 
In a rush to catch a flight, so I'll make this brief.
 
The subject of this message sounds like there might be some sort of causal relationship between Cognizant and Internet futures, but I'm really referring to two separate issues (and two different articles).  Although the article which is the basis for my Cognizant spin made my secondary urls listing in my last posting, it's worth reconsidering, especially for their take on China.
 
The article on Infosys was a Q&A session with one of their senior execs, Francisco D'Souza (see http://tinyurl.com/3lpyu ).  Some of the more interesting points (in no particular order):  For one thing, Cognizant invests about 25-26% in SG&A, almost twice that of their competitors.  (As a marketing and bizdev guy, kudos to Cognizant for their foresight!)  "This has helped us (i.e., Cognizant) build a formidable sales and marketing infrastructure and invest in local practice leaders, client partners, relationship managers and so on."  They also took an early lead in verticalization, "which is another reason for richer customer experience."  A key issue, of course, is that Cognizant has already started its expansion outside India into other low-cost locations like China.  Kudos again!  (They have a foray into Europe, but it's minor:  They also view the "Golden Triangle" as the best strategy.)  They also believe that it will be "quite normal" for them to be delivering to customers from multiple locations in the world.
 
Here's a great quote (I guess neoIT didn't see it):  "The initial feedback is that clients are interested in piloting work in China.  Our experience on the ground in China is that we've been able to find talented individuals with reasonable English-language capabilities."  Another comment (playing off my "Golden Triangle" theme):  "Currently, only India and China represent the potential to scale up volumes.  This may well continue for another decade." 
 
On a related note, an exec (K.S. Suryaprakash) with Infosys was recently quoted as saying, "China is the only country which can offer cost scales comparable to India."  In their Shanghai operation, they have "seven or eight Indians" among their staff of 25 -- and they use Donald Duck posters to help teach English!  See http://tinyurl.com/5wyga .
 
Sorry, but I really tried to include the "Intelligent Internet" and the 2005 IT budgets sneak preview in this posting; alas, I'll complete this in Dalian.  Got to run!!  (I already wrote what follows last night.)
 
The International Software and Information Services Outsourcing Business Development Forum (in Dalian later TODAY)
 
Off to Dalian to give a presentation on ITO market opportunities, primarily from an enterprise software perspective.  What's hot, what's emerging, IT e-strategies (hmmm ... sounds familiar), the usual stuff.  A bit on "why China," but this is being covered by several other speakers; none of the other speakers seem to be focused on market opportunities from an apps perspective.  In case anyone is wondering, I'm one of the invited speakers at this forum.
 
Next: Collaboration Technologies: The Great Hope? (unless something at CISIS captures my attention).  (Oops ... after I finish this posting.)
 
What I'm Reading:  Besides four articles and papers on collaboration technologies, I'm reading the special section on P2P-based data management in the July issue of IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (a couple of papers from this issue have already been urled; see my urls blog), a paper on the evolution of IR to information interaction (I hope Google reads it), and a paper on web services for bioinformatics (which is a SUPERB paper, also already urled).  The latter paper may make it into a posting, so don't expect to see it on the "Top Ten" list for this week (but I might include it on the secondary list).
 
Cheers,
 
David Scott Lewis
President & Principal Analyst
IT E-Strategies, Inc.
Menlo Park, CA & Qingdao, China
 
http://www.itestrategies.com (current blog postings optimized for MSIE6.x)
http://tinyurl.com/2r3pa (access to blog content archives in China)
 

Sunday, July 25, 2004

[urls] Top 10 Urls of the Week: A Taste of Furl

Sunday, July 25, 2004
Dateline: China
 
The following is a sampling of my "urls" for the past week.  By signing up with Furl (it's free), anyone can subscribe to an e-mail feed of my urls -- and limit by subject AND rating.  It's also possible to receive an RSS feed.  However, if you'd like to receive a daily feed of my urls but do NOT want to sign up with Furl, I can manually add your name to my daily Furl distribution list.  (And if you want off, I'll promptly remove your e-mail address.)
 
Briefly, over the past week I added over 300 urls to my "goldentriange" Furl account.  In the editing process, I whittled down the number to nearly 60 in my first pass and then deleted about 50 more urls to create "Dave's Top Ten (Urls) List" (of the week).  Think about it:  Only one in 30 made the grade.
 
For one thing, I've excluded ALL sites referenced in any of my three blogs.  Also, ALL "dated" items with short shelf-life were cut (such as news stories), although over two-thirds of the "urled" pages over the past week were news-related.  (My assumption is that everyone already has their favorite news sources.)  OTOH, I didn't want to include items which are a bit too research-focused, either.  Truly a delicate balance.
 
Enjoy -- and please zap me your feedback!  And, if you'd like to receive the daily feed (which includes news items), please let me know.
 
 
Examples of urls that didn't make my "Top Ten List":
 
 
and many, many more ...
 
Cheers,
 
David Scott Lewis
President & Principal Analyst
IT E-Strategies, Inc.
Menlo Park, CA & Qingdao, China
e-mail: click on http://tinyurl.com/3mbzq (temporary, until Gmail resolves their problems; I haven't been able to access my Gmail messages for the past week)
 
http://www.itestrategies.com (current blog postings optimized for MSIE6.x)
http://tinyurl.com/2r3pa (access to blog content archives in China)
http://tinyurl.com/2azkh (current blog postings for viewing in other browsers and for access to blog content archives in the US & ROW)
http://tinyurl.com/2hg2e (AvantGo channel)
 
 
To automatically subscribe click on http://tinyurl.com/388yf .
 

Friday, July 23, 2004

[emerging tech] "Web Engineering: The Evolution of New Technologies" & the Ultimate Killer App

Friday, July 23, 2004
Dateline: China
 
Reviews of papers from the current (July/August 2004) issue of Computing in Science & Engineering, special issue on "Web Engineering: The Evolution of New Technologies."  To order articles from this issue, first click on http://tinyurl.com/5ktaw .
 
Earlier this week I posted excerpts from the lead article in the current issue of CiSE.  The article was titled, "Managing XML Data: An Abridged Overview," which is a good, accurate title.  The excerpts contain useful links, too. 
 
I am going to take a variety of approaches for handling four other papers in this special issue.  However, I first want to provide a link to the introduction to this special issue, i.e., http://tinyurl.com/6sbjx .  The intro itself provides a few useful references and links.
 
The second article is titled, "Information Retrieval Techniques for Peer-to-Peer Networks."  Fortunately, a full-text PDF copy of this paper can be accessed at either http://dblab.cs.ucr.edu/ or http://tinyurl.com/6v2ru, although the URL for the former looks a little bit too generic and might change at a moment's notice (also, the two papers are slightly different).  I have 19 bookmarks on my smartphone for this paper, but I guess I can summarize by saying that IR for P2P networks is hard and very different from "traditional" searchThe last statement actually says a lot -- read between the lines.  This paper covers all the usual suspects and also includes Skype. This paper is based upon the lead author's Master's thesis which can be accessed from http://tinyurl.com/696ml .  Other papers by the lead author can be accessed at http://tinyurl.com/43kkh .  This is an important issue which needs to be resolved, especially as collaborative grid computing (CGC) comes to life.
 
Two figures; 20 references (28 references in the preprint).
 
Less luck with the paper titled, "Web Searching and Information Retrieval," i.e., I couldn't find a free copy on the Web.  The author's site is woefully outdated, too.  The author does speak favorably of a particular approach to decentralized P2P web crawling called "Apoidea."   A copy of a paper describing Apoidea can be accessed at http://tinyurl.com/4m2v5 ; accompanying slides can be accessed at http://tinyurl.com/4b4sh .  As described in the CiSE paper, "Apoidea is both self-managing and uses the resource's geographical proximity to its peers for a better and faster crawl."
 
Two figures; 21 references.
 
To request a copy of this article click on: http://tinyurl.com/7yyl2 or http://tinyurl.com/6m6ff (I'm not sure which address works; I already have a copy of this article so I don't need to contact the author!).
 
"Web Mining: Research and Practice" is not available, either, but a lot of excellent info on the senior author's projects related to this paper is available.  First, take a look at the eBiquity research areas at http://tinyurl.com/52p9n .  Next, you may want to take a look at the abstracts for papers published as part of the eBiquity Group at http://tinyurl.com/5om58 (current through December 2004 -- it doesn't get more current!!).  Move on to their "Semantic Web" page at http://tinyurl.com/4a8fr .  I then downloaded a PDF copy of their paper titled, "Mining Domain Specific Texts and Glossaries to Evaluate and Enrich Domain Ontologies" (see http://tinyurl.com/3lg2m ).  It looks like a relatively recent paper, newer than the CiSE paper (different authors and different subject matter, though).  The PDF is part of their Semantic Web research, whereas the CiSE paper is more "generic."  Anyway, the "Web Mining" paper is another call for distributed mining techniques, and covers fuzzy clustering as well as content-based recommender systems -- but doesn't forget good 'ol HITS (Hyperlink-Induced Topic Search), the basis for IBM's Clever and Google (to a certain extent).
 
No figures; 31 references.
 
To request a copy of this article click on: http://tinyurl.com/5xv3p .
 
Finally, "Intelligent Agents on the Web: A Review" was very disappointing.  The lead author has impeccable credentials, but his paper is based on yesterday's news:  Old, outdated, buried stuff (like Firefly).  Matter of fact, the only live link I can recall finding was Recursion Software's "Voyager" home page (see http://tinyurl.com/3wpem ), which states that the "Voyager applications development platform provides the software layer which handles communications across the network for distributed JAVA applications."  (Looks interesting.)
 
I did a little more digging and surfed over to two stand-by sites (both referenced directly or indirectly in the "Intelligent Agents" paper), namely the MIT Media Lab Software Agents page and Oren Etzioni's (oops, I mean the University of Washington, Department of Computer Science) page.  At the MIT projects page (see http://tinyurl.com/4ocss ) is a listing of several "commonsense" projects, e.g., "Using Commonsense Reasoning to Enable the Semantic Web" (see http://tinyurl.com/4deq7 ).  A draft White Paper on this is available at http://tinyurl.com/4e4bv , as is a presentation at http://tinyurl.com/4le2n along with a couple of video demos.  I also downloaded a paper on GOOSE (GOal-Oriented Search Engine) at http://tinyurl.com/4fyeu .  At UWash I went to their XML data management page (see http://tinyurl.com/5x98a ) and then grabbed two papers:  One on "Probabilistic Methods For Querying Global Information Systems" dated 14 July 2004 (see http://tinyurl.com/45uz7 ) and another titled, "Learning Text Patterns for Web Information Extraction and Assessment" dated May 2004 (see http://tinyurl.com/6k5fz ).  (To download other unrestricted reports, go to http://tinyurl.com/5z2x7 .)  Frankly, I need a bit of time to digest the two recently published UWash papers.
 
As the chair of the Internet and Web applications session of the First International Conference on Autonomous Agents (1996), I have a soft spot for agent-oriented everything (especially Web apps).  I remember an old saying from IJCAI (International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence) in the mid-70's:  Artificial intelligence is better than none.  (I probably still have a button with this saying somewhere.)  I'm keeping the faith, sans the hype and more toward the realities of software agents.  BTW, this CiSE paper isn't bad if you don't have any background in this space.  It covers the basics, such as ACLs, but with an "updated" perspective.
 
No figures; 27 references.
 
To request a copy of this article click on: http://tinyurl.com/6zzqs .
 
 
The Ultimate Killer App
 
BTW, the "Ultimate Killer App" is attached and in some browsers it will automatically download.  (See the bottom of this message.)  You have to admit, this really is the ultimate killer app!!
 
I've never sent an attachment this way simultaneously to both my e-newsletter and blogs (and blog variants).  Just in case the attachment isn't included, I've uploaded it to the "Photos" section of the e-newsletter (see http://tinyurl.com/2r3pa .)
 
>> Note to AlwaysOn readers: You'll need to go to the e-newsletter ( http://tinyurl.com/2r3pa ) in order to see the "Ultimate Killer App."  You can try the blogs, but no guarantees.
 
 
Tidbits on Enterprise Software
 
.NET wins converts.  For the VARBusiness story see http://tinyurl.com/3omd2 .  Evans Data reports that .NET usage showed a sharp YoY increase in adoption with 52% saying they use .NET and 68% saying they plan to deploy .NET apps by 2005.  In May, Forrester reported that 56% of developers consider .NET their primary development environment contrasted with 44% for J2EE.  (It must have been a binary choice!)  VARBusiness found in a May survey that 53% have already deployed a .NET app and 66% plan to do so within the next 12 months.  In the VARBusiness survey, the most important reasons for going with .NET were ease of use and quicker time to market.  A developer goes on to state that .NET development time is to Java what Java is to C++.  (Wow, what a claim!)
 
Python and Perl beat Java?  (See http://tinyurl.com/44m5t for the PDF file.)  Actually, an indirect "attack" against all "mainstream" programming languages, notably Java, C and C++.  The idea is that the "mainstream" languages are ill-suited for many distributed computing and integration apps.  Gives a "thumbs up" to Python, Perl and PHP, with a peek at PEAK -- the Python Enterprise Application Kit.  (Sorry for the pun.)  PEAK's developers claim future superiority over J2EE.  They also knock Java for not being suited to rapid application development.  PEAK's developers believe a Python-based approach to component-based apps will result in systems that are simpler, faster and easier to install, manage and maintain than variants in J2EE.  PEAK, however, is still immature.
 
Grid computing takes off.  Another survey from Evans Data (see http://tinyurl.com/4l2qb ).  37% of database developers are implementing or planning to implement a grid computing architecture.  In related data, 34% of companies are focusing their database development work on BI (business intelligence) platforms.  See also Oracle's spin on this at http://tinyurl.com/4n2kf .
 
The spoils of ROI.  From IDC's Group VP, Solutions Research, there are several issues which must be addressed in order to maximize IT ROI.  (See http://tinyurl.com/228kv .)  Four of the key issues are:
  • Should the IT agenda include investment in outsourcing technologies or services?
  • Does the future of the business include operations in, or electronic trade with, additional countries - China, for example?
  • Are the services of an outside provider being considered to help in managing proliferating applications or complex "interenterprise" business relationships?
  • What role will utility computing play in the future of IT?
(All items in bold are my emphasis.)  The article goes on to discuss various ways of evaluating ROI, including one of my favorite ways, ROA (real options analysis). 
 
TTFN.  Have a GREAT weekend!
 
Cheers,
 
David Scott Lewis
President & Principal Analyst
IT E-Strategies, Inc.
Menlo Park, CA & Qingdao, China
WARNING:  To avoid spam (well, to avoid getting at least some spam), I'm using a Gmail account with a special address.  However, I have NOT been able to access the messages in my Gmail account for the past FOUR days!!  Not sure how long this will last.  In the interim, also use:
DavidScottLewis.2520656@bloglines.com -- but also Cc: the above address.  Of course, if you already know me, feel free to send messages to my primary and secondary e-mail accounts.  (If you know me, you already know what they are.  The primary account is working fine.)
 
http://www.itestrategies.com (current blog postings optimized for MSIE6.x)
http://tinyurl.com/2r3pa (access to blog content archives in China)
http://tinyurl.com/2azkh (current blog postings for viewing in other browsers and for access to blog content archives in the US & ROW)
http://tinyurl.com/2hg2e (AvantGo channel)
 
 
To automatically subscribe click on http://tinyurl.com/388yf .

[news] Special Reports, Advice, ITO Tidbits & an Announcement

Friday, July 23, 2004
Dateline: China
 
A few special reports to mention.  The current (15 July) issue of CIO Magazine has a cover story on ITO (IT outsourcing) titled, "Outsourcing World Tour 2004" (cute title).  A clickable map covers countries not usually on the short list for ITO, including Chile, South Africa and Thailand.  Covers BPO as well.  See http://tinyurl.com/676sh .
 
Not for everyone, but Washington Technology has a special report on new defense opportunities titled, "Warfare 2.0".  Great report with lots of details.  Includes info about "Starlight" (an XML-based 3D visualization tool), DoD's "Global Information Grid" and a bit of G2 on DARPA's Information Exploitation Office.  (Remember, it was DAPRA's predecessor, ARPA, who funded the creation of the Internet.)  See http://tinyurl.com/6jw43 .
 
For American firms pondering their China strategy, a "2004 Special Edition" of The McKinsey Quarterly features an article titled, "A Guide to Doing Business in China."  Good advice and shatters many myths, although not specific to ITO.  See http://tinyurl.com/43rak .
 
On a somewhat related topic (albeit focused a bit more on BPO than ITO), Accenture has published "Executive Survey Results" in a report titled, "Driving High-Performance Outsourcing: Best Practices from the Masters."  This seven page PDF report attempts to "provide a snapshot of the choices and challenges facing newcomers to outsourcing:
• "What timeline can we expect, and what kind of partner
do we need?"
• "Which processes should we outsource, and which should
we keep?"
• "How do you structure the deal to allow for changes in the
business environment over the course of the arrangement?"
• "Can you outsource a business function whose processes are
broken, or do you need to fix it first and then outsource?"
• "How does an outsourcing arrangement impact our
relationship with unions?"
• "We have projects going all the time; how do you juggle
all those projects and introduce outsourcing without the
disruption?"
 
One finding:  "A majority (59 percent) use risk/reward incentives to spur high performance from their outsourcing partners.  Incentives may
be used to reward extraordinary performance or to encourage
higher levels of risk."  For more, see http://tinyurl.com/49rk4 .
 
Take This to the Bank: Advice for SIs in China

    "亚星软件公司作为专业从事软件外包出口的公司,通过外包定单来联盟国内的软件企业,用美国人来开辟美国市场,获取定单,用自己的质量管理体系来连接和管理联盟和市场。亚星人形象的称这种模式为"哑铃"模式。
    Ã¥Â¯Â¹Ã¤ÂºÂŽÃ¤Â¸Â­Ã¥Â›Â½Ã¨Â½Â¯Ã¤Â»Â¶Ã¥Â‡ÂºÃ¥ÂÂ£Ã¯Â¼ÂŒÃ¦ÂˆÂ‘们知道国内有很多企业,他们各自都有自己的订单获取方法和途径,但是经过我们的考察发现,如果直接在美国设立办事处,效果并不十分理想。中国人去开辟美国市场,由于存在语言、文化等方面的巨大差别,显得十分吃力。而印度软件出口业之所以成功,很大程度上缘于三点:第一点:留学生资源。他们的1/3的留学人员留在国外,2/3的人员回国,而且在国外的人员有很多已经在美国软件企业中做到了中高层的位置,他们具备获取这些订单的能力,而我们国家的留学生大部分还只是在做底层的开发,并没有能力获得订单;第二点:印度天然的语言优势。印度的官方语言为英语,不存在很大的文化差异和沟通障碍;第三点:印度软件业的质量意识。据统计,全球通过CMM5的软件企业总共23家,印度就占了 15家。这是印度之所以成为美国主要软件出口基地的重要原因之一。所以我们毅然采用了用软件外包市场本土的营销人员来开辟其本土市场的市场营销模式,这也是我们同美国GSS公司签订合同的主要原因,当然这也要求我们严格按照国际商务准则来运作。同时通过与本土的营销人员合作还可以收集到很多源于竞争对手的信息,比如印度或者俄罗斯的商业计划书是如何书写的?他们有具备哪些优势和劣势?这些都是我们制定相应战略的基础。同时他们也把国际外包市场最好的培训信息,最新的技术动态给我们传递过来。通过这样高起点的跨国经营管理将公司的整个层次都提高了很多。"  (See http://tinyurl.com/48jbm .)
 
Announcement: CISIS Outsourcing Business Development Forum Presentation

I will be giving a presentation on IT outsourcing market opportunities during next Thursday's CISIS Outsourcing Business Development Forum.  The CISIS (China International Software & Information Service) Fair begins next Wednesday morning (the 28th) and goes through Friday.  See http://www.cisis.com.cn for more information.
 
I will be in Dalian from Wednesday afternoon through Friday evening.  If you are planning to attend this event or are based in Dalian and would like to get together, please let me know.  I am keeping Friday open for meetings, although it's filling up fast.  Also, there is a reception (of sorts) on Wednesday night on the 3rd Floor at the Shangri-La beginning at 19:00; I'll be at the "reception" for at least the first hour.  I look forward to seeing many of you next week!
 
ITO Tidbits
 
From the mouth of Infosys' COO, "In terms of infrastructure, China scores higher than India."  (From a Networld World supplement on outsourcing; see http://tinyurl.com/4uglp .)  From the marketing veep at Silicon Valley-based Sygate, "The cost structure is pretty spectacular; it's about one-eighth that of the U.S."  Sygate is similar in structure to Achievo:  U.S. headquarters with most of the development work done in China.  (Achievo is one of the few firms that should be on just about everyone's short list.)
 
And how about this:  "Gartner has claimed China could overtake India's outsourcing crown by 2007 with its 2,00,000 (sic) software professionals and a booming domestic software market with spending on IT increasing by 20 per cent per year since 1999."  A couple of grammatical errors, but an interesting remark from Gartner.  (The grammatical errors are likely the responsibility of the publisher, not Gartner.)  See http://shorl.com/dudruhufaledre .
 
On the "downside," a look at ITO's "hidden costs", in CIO Australia.  See http://tinyurl.com/6odc9 .  Nothing terribly new, but a good case study.
 
For some advice on how to manage the seams between multiple outsourcing relationships, see http://tinyurl.com/6qdkv .  THIS IS A STICKY ISSUE, especially since many of China's larger SIs want to sub-contract (in essence, further outsource) to smaller SIs.  Frankly, I'm a bit suspicious about this:  It requires a lot of faith from an American client.  It's the "I barely know YOU, and I have NO CLUE who these other guys are" problem.  Sounds like a one-way ticket to getting fired for an American IT exec.
 
A bit of common sense from an IDG news blurb.  Talks about sending out RFPs to about 50 companies, a small trial project, and the need for collaboration technology.  See the IDG piece at http://tinyurl.com/2etll .
 
Finally, "(i)n a survey of top decision makers on corporate outsourcing policies, 59% said they expect to increase their outsourcing budget by 20% or more in the next 18 months."  Also, the so-called outsourcing debate has had little impact on outsourcing decisions and "lost knowledge" was cited as the key workforce-related risk.  See the Patni press release at http://tinyurl.com/54869 .  It's also a pretty good example of the right way to issue a self-serving press release.
Cheers,
 
David Scott Lewis
President & Principal Analyst
IT E-Strategies, Inc.
Menlo Park, CA & Qingdao, China
 
To automatically subscribe click on http://tinyurl.com/388yf .
 

Tuesday, July 20, 2004

[news] "Terrorists Infiltrate Outsourcing Firms: Attacks Planned Against U.S. Financial Institutions"

Tuesday, July 20, 2004
Dateline: China
 
"... a terrorist cell looking for an advantage against the powerful U.S. military trains a group to be software programmers, who then infiltrate companies that have sent their software development work overseas. Working for those companies, the programmers surreptitiously put vulnerabilities in software." 
 
Read the story from Federal Computer Week at http://tinyurl.com/58era .  BTW, FCW is a well-respected trade; it's the Computerworld for U.S. government IT personnel.
 
Just in case you're wondering, the "Subject" line heading is not true -- or, is it?
 
Bottom line:  I don't even want to think about it ...
 
David Scott Lewis
President & Principal Analyst
IT E-Strategies, Inc.
Menlo Park, CA & Qingdao, China

[news] neoIT Slams China: A Critique of their Hot-Off-The-Press White Paper

Tuesday, July 20, 2004
Dateline: China
 
I'm convinced that the folks who call themselves "analysts" at neoIT are just plain ignorant and stupid.  The so-called "update" to their Mapping Offshore Markets report was released earlier today (California time; it's Tuesday morning in China).  What a farce!!  Absolute garbage and their info on China looks exactly like the same info they published last year, with plenty of omissions and misinformation (whether intentional or not).
 
However, this year they gave a blow to China and "demoted" China as a preferred destination for ITO (IT outsourcing).  Matter of fact, in their "Key Findings" section they list India and Canada as the two top choices, with a favorable mention given to the Philippines, Russia, the Czech Republic, Poland, Hungary and Mexico -- NO mention of China!!
 
The good news, I guess, is that their report gives me plenty of cannon fodder for a counter-attack against their buffoonery.
 
It is absolutely amazing that China comes up as the number two spot after India in just about EVERY survey.  It seems that just about everyone is scrambling to develop a "China strategy."  But according to neoIT, you'd better have a Philippines, Hungary and Mexico strategy first, even though their own stats show that the level of ITO activity in China is almost equal to the COMBINED IT services exports of the Philippines, Russia, the Czech Republic, Mexico, Hungary and Poland (to repeat, China = Russia + the Philippines + the Czech Republic + Hungary + Poland + Mexico; not quite, but almost). Yes, most of the ITO in China is for Japanese clients, but who are the major clients for ITO services performed in Eastern European countries?  And since their "facts" about China are wrong, I'm suspicious of their data regarding Mexico, too.  BTW, even if China's ITO is mostly for Japanese clients, this does NOT mean that there are not significant resources in China perfectly capable of servicing American clientsI'll go so far as to say that in at least two of China's "cities of excellence" (my phrase), the systems integrators are focused on the States (NOT Japan) -- and in working with U.S. systems integrators, software vendors and corporate IT shops.
 
Also, I'll give a little bit of a pre-release announcement.  A major global (but U.S.-based) management consulting firm (one we all know and love) will be validating their earlier research that China is indeed the number two spot after India.
 
I'm keeping to my mantra:  It's all about the Golden Triangle:  The U.S., India and China.
 
To review a copy of the neoIT press release click on http://tinyurl.com/5t5eb .
To retrieve a copy of their White Paper click on http://tinyurl.com/4hzru .
 
Bottom line:  IMHO, neoIT has lost it.  "Dumb and dumber" isn't just the title of a movie, it's the best way to describe neoIT.  I used to think pretty highly of their analysts; at this point, I've lost all respect.
 
(BTW, a report released over the past week by eMarketer notes that one of the things blog readers cherish most is honesty by bloggers.  Well, I'm being honest.) 
 
Cheers,
 
David Scott Lewis
President & Principal Analyst
IT E-Strategies, Inc.
Menlo Park, CA & Qingdao, China
 
http://www.itestrategies.com (current blog postings optimized for MSIE6.x)
http://tinyurl.com/2r3pa (access to blog content archives in China)
http://tinyurl.com/2azkh (current blog postings for viewing in other browsers and for access to blog content archives in the US & ROW)
http://tinyurl.com/2hg2e (AvantGo channel)
 
 
To automatically subscribe click on http://tinyurl.com/388yf .
 

Monday, July 19, 2004

[emerging tech] "Managing XML Data" (Web Engineering: The Evolution of New Technologies)

Monday, July 19, 2004
Dateline: China
 
Excerpts from the current issue of Computing in Science & Engineering, special issue on "Web Engineering: The Evolution of New Technologies."  To order this article, click on http://tinyurl.com/6v3cc .  (Note: Formatting has been changed from the original article; however, ordering is consistent.)
 
XML's flexibility makes it a natural format for both exchanging and integrating data from diverse data sources.  In this survey, the authors give an overview of issues in managing XML data, discuss existing solutions, and outline the current technology's open problems and limitations.

A diverse set of factors has fueled the explosion of interest in XML ( http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml ): XML's self-describing nature makes it more amenable for use in loosely coupled data-exchange systems, and the flexible semistructured data model behind it makes it natural as a format for integrating data from various sources.

But much of its success stems from the existence of standard languages for each aspect of XML processing and the rapid emergence of tools for manipulating XML.  Popular tools include parsers such as Xerces ( http://xml.apache.org/xerces-j ), query processors such as Galax ( http://db.bell-labs.com/galax ), and transformation tools such as Xalan ( http://xml.apache.org/xalan-j ).  The development of this standards framework has made XML dialects powerful vehicles for standardization in communities that exchange data.

In this article, we discuss the main problems involved in managing XML data.  Our objective is to clarify potential issues that must be considered when building XML-based applications---in particular, XML solutions' benefits as well as possible pitfalls.  Our intent is not to give an exhaustive review of XML data-management (XDM) literature, XML standards, or a detailed study of commercial products.  Instead, we aim to provide an overview of a representative subset to illustrate how some XDM problems are addressed. 

Because data typically is stored in non-XML database systems, applications must publish data in XML for exchange purposes.  When a target application receives XML data, it can remap and store it in internal data structures or a target database system.  Applications can also access an XML document either through APIs such as the Document Object Model (DOM; http://www.w3.org/DOM ) or query languages.  The applications can directly access the document in native format or, with conversion, from a network stream or non-XML database format.

In contrast with relational database management systems (RDBMSs) that had a clear initial motivation in supporting online transaction processing (OLTP) scenarios, XML applications' requirements vary widely.  Applications must deal with several different kinds of queries (structured and keyword-based) in different scenarios (with or without transaction support, over stored or streaming data), as well as data with varying characteristics (ordered and unordered, with or without a schema).

Commercial database vendors have also shown significant interest in XDM---support for XML data is present in most RDBMSs.  Examples include IBM's DB2 XML Extender ( http://www4.ibm.com/software/data/db2/extenders/xmlext.html ), Microsoft's support for XML ( http://msdn.microsoft.com/sqlxml/ ), and Oracle's XML DB ( http://otn.oracle.com/tech/xml/xmldb/ ).

In XML, common querying tasks include filtering and selecting values, merging and integrating values from multiple documents, and transforming XML documents.  While XML has enabled the creation of standard data formats within industries and communities, adoption of these standards has led to an enormous and immediate problem of exporting data available in legacy formats to meet newly created standard schemata.  Several publishing languages have been proposed to specify XML views over the legacy data---that is, how to map legacy data (such as tables) into a predefined XML format.

In this section, we discuss limitations of existing solutions as well as some open problems.  Our discussion is biased toward problems we have encountered in trying to create effective and scalable XDM solutions; it is by no means exhaustive.

Parsing and validating a document against an XML Schema or DTD are CPU-intensive tasks that can be a major bottleneck in XML management.  A recent study of XML parsing and validation performance indicates that response times and transaction rates over XML data cannot be achieved without significant improvements in XML parsing technology.  It suggests enhancements such as using parallel processing techniques and preparsed binary XML formats as well as better support for incremental parsing and validation.

By using XML-specific compression techniques, tools such as XMill compare favorably against several generic compressors.  Compression techniques have also been proposed that support direct querying over the compressed data, which besides saving space, also improve query processing times.

The ability to support updates is becoming increasingly important as XML evolves into a universal data representation format.  Although proposals for defining and implementing updates have emerged, a standard has yet to be defined for an update language.

Three figures & sample code; 23 references.

To request a copy of this article click on: http://tinyurl.com/6kcqw .

 
Cheers,
 
David Scott Lewis
President & Principal Analyst
IT E-Strategies, Inc.
Menlo Park, CA & Qingdao, China
 
http://www.itestrategies.com (current blog postings optimized for MSIE6.x)
http://tinyurl.com/2r3pa (access to blog content archives in China)
http://tinyurl.com/2azkh (current blog postings for viewing in other browsers and for access to blog content archives in the US & ROW)
http://tinyurl.com/2hg2e (AvantGo channel)
 
 
To automatically subscribe click on http://tinyurl.com/388yf .
 

[humor] The Mind of an American Programmer (courtesy of Sun Microsystems)

Monday, July 19, 2004
Dateline: China
 
Go to:  http://www.sun.com/aboutsun/media/features/insidejack1/start.html .  A wee bit off topic, but a great perspective on the thoughts of an American programmer ... I mean, "developer."  This is the funniest thing I've seen in a while; it accurately captures life in Silicon Valley.  Even better than Dilbert (although yesterday's Dilbert on execs collecting "trophy wives" was pretty good). 
 
There's audio with the animation, so turn on your speakers and turn up the volume.  Watch out for the jab at IBM Global Services ...
 
Next:  As promised, the blog posting on "The Evolution of New Technologies," a review of five emerging technologies.
 
Cheers,
 
David Scott Lewis
President & Principal Analyst
IT E-Strategies, Inc.
Menlo Park, CA & Qingdao, China

Saturday, July 17, 2004

[news] "Urling" Instead of "Blogging"

Saturday, July 17, 2004
Dateline: China
 
Note:  To skip the following chatter, simply go to:  http://www.furl.net/members/goldentriangle .  The link is self-explanatory.
 
Next posting:  "The Evolution of New Technologies" (in a couple/few days).
 
I just did a Google search and it looks like I've created a new word:  "urling."  Some may argue that it should be, "URLing," but it doesn't really matter to me.  For now, I'll stick with "urling."  And, as "blogs" are to "blogging," "urls" (again, some may argue that it should be, "URLs") are to "urling."
 
Two sites inspired me to come up with the new term, Furl and Spurl.  (See http://www.furl.net and http://www.spurl.net ; there's a more popular site with somewhat similar features, but I can't stand it.)  So what in the world am I talking about?  The best way to describe what I'm talking about is to paraphrase a bit from the Furl FAQ.  In essence, blogging is about creating (and created) content; urling is about consumed (and consuming) content.  Notice that there is a slight difference in tense, which also notes another difference between blogging and urling.
 
We all know what blogging is, so let me attempt to explain what urling is.  Urling is the sharing of annotated URLs (i.e., "urls").  In practice (and this is what really counts), urling is the process of sharing cool sites by simply saving them via a bookmarklet.
 
So, big deal.  Why should I care?  Well, in practice, Web users bookmark very few items that they actually see.  However, there are often a lot of sites that users visit that might very well be worth sharing with others.  But doing this (i.e., sharing bookmarks, especially if someone regularly goes on a bookmarking rampage) is a rather tedious process.  Using a Furl or Spurl bookmarklet, urling makes it simple to share the cool sites users visit with all others who may be interested.  They can even be shared as XML feeds!!  Furl and Spurl are a generation beyond the bookmark sharing sites circa the bubble.
 
Furl and Spurl also capture "urled" sites, offer recommendations, even provide a pseudo-social networking feature (although I'm a bit skeptical about this feature).
 
Two Days in the Life of Urling: The Practical Differences Between Blogging and Urling ... and a Peek at Urling Futures
 
I try to blog two or three times each week.  But in the process, I review dozens (perhaps hundreds) of articles and sites just to come up with some original content for my blog.  As we all know, blogs often tend to copy from one another.  ("Copy" may be viewed as an inflammatory word to some bloggers.  No harm intended.)  Blogging is kind of strange in that if bloggers trackback to one another, their Google results improve.  Great for catching fads, I guess, but I'm not sure if any of this really matters for serious content.  I'll go so far as to say that many (most) blogs do not have very much serious content.
 
Urling can get equally as ridiculous and people may want to share all sorts of questionable sites.  But it's also possible to find like-minded individuals and subscribe to what they're urling each day.  Also, not everyone likes to write.  (Some love it, some people hate it -- especially since words put to a blog are seemingly immortalized.)  Now, people who don't like to write, but find a lot of cool, useful information can share with others in a way which is not at all intimidating.  No need to think about pithy things to say in a blog; simply share a cool new site you've found or a new article describing whatever by urling.
 
I'm planning to use Spurl for my personal urling and I'm already using Furl for my public urling.  I can't comment on Spurl's bookmarklet feature, but I must say that Furl is rather slow.  Fact is, I can save an item using Bloglines much faster than I can using Furl.  So speed is an issue.  (I hope the folks at Furl read this.)
 
I also wonder why Bloglines can't do something just like Furl (or Spurl).  For my "master edition" of Bloglines, I have 64 feeds, including numerous newsletters I receive through Bloglines (including about two dozen Google News Alerts, Computerworld newsletters -- which to me are easier to read than their XML feeds, and newsletters from Line56 <they don't have XML feeds> plus Network World newsletters, among others).  Frankly, the ability to receive e-newsletters along with my XML news feeds is one of Bloglines' coolest features.  This "master edition" of Bloglines comprises most of my "must read" trade and industry news sources.  So, Bloglines should simply add the same features provided by Furl and Spurl.  Right now I have to save an article I come across through Bloglines twice:  Once as a clip in Bloglines and another via urling.  It would be much, much simpler if I was able to "url" (which rhymes with "Furl") once in Bloglines, and still have the same sharing, recommendation and annotation features provided by Furl.
 
Back to my "two days" perspective.  Over the past two days I tried urling with Furl.  I "urled" 39 articles and sites on Friday and about 20 today (but the day is still young).  Lots of good stuff, but NOTHING that I want to blog about.  Also, yesterday and today were/are light reading days.  My guess is that I would average at least 50 "urls" each day, with a ratio of about 100 "urls" per blog posting.  That's right:  A 100:1 ratio.
 
I'm even testing to see how things get picked up in the "urlosphere."  (Sorry, I just had to say this!  I hope nobody really uses the term "urlosphere.")  I tossed out to fellow "urlers" the links to a few potentially hot sites, including the sites for the iRider and Deepnet browsers, and for BYU's Data Extraction Research Group (focused on Semantic Web apps).  It will be interesting to see what happens to these links in the "urlosphere."
 
Take a look at my entries:  http://www.furl.net/members/goldentriangle .
To receive as a RSS feed, subscribe to:  http://www.furl.net/members/goldentriangle/rss.xml .
 
Bottom line:  Let's see how this goes.  Frankly, I'd rather focus my blog on two subjects:  ITO (from a trade and business perspective) and "hot" technologies (but from a more contemplative and technical perspective, NOT a knee-jerk reaction to jerky press releases).  I'd rather leave the non-ITO tech trade stuff to urling and still have the ability to share noteworthy findings.
 
Cheers,
 
David Scott Lewis
President & Principal Analyst
IT E-Strategies, Inc.
Menlo Park, CA & Qingdao, China
http://www.itestrategies.com (current blog postings optimized for MSIE6.x)
http://tinyurl.com/2r3pa (access to blog content archives in China)
http://tinyurl.com/2azkh (current blog postings for viewing in other browsers and for access to blog content archives in the US & ROW)
http://tinyurl.com/2hg2e (AvantGo channel)
 
To automatically subscribe click on http://tinyurl.com/388yf .
 

Tuesday, July 13, 2004

[news] BearingPoint: Coming/Going to China + Kingdee: Going/Coming to America

Tuesday, July 13, 2004
Dateline: China
 
I have a few headier postings in the queue about usability for pervasive devices; another on data extraction and knowledge representation(focused on three very different approaches and tools, XWRAP Elite, Ontos and ViSWeb); a review of five papers from a current, special issue of an ACM journal covering Web mining, P2P search, XML and software agents -- the issue is titled, "The Evolution of New Technologies"; and another on social networking for developing advanced technologies (a different spin on the social networking phenomena).  Alas, news noise got the better part of me.
 
Yesterday Computerworld published a nice piece on BearingPoint's expansion in China, specifically in Dalian.  Good piece, but old, old news:  ChinaTechNews had the announcement last Monday (the 5th) -- a week in Internet time is like a year in human time; the actual announcement was on the 2nd.  (For the Computerworld story, see http://tinyurl.com/6syo5 ; for the ChinaTechNews story, see http://tinyurl.com/66rm3 .)
 
No surprises from BearingPoint:  They'll be offering "software development" (I love these nebulous phrases), ERP implementation, application integration, app management (I think they mean software maintenance), and BPO services.
 
In the Computerworld article, a NeoIT analyst knocked China (again) as being well behind India as a provider of software development services.  (IMHO, this particular NeoIT analyst has an extremely pro-India, pro-Eastern Europe bias.)  He stated that India had IT services exports of about US$9.5 billion last year compared with about US$700 million for China.  He went on to state (correctly) that most of the work done in China is for Korean and Japanese customers.  My question to NeoIT:  Can't "China" leverage the $700 million in work done for Korean and Japanese clients into contracts with U.S. systems integrators (SIs) and software vendors (ISVs)?  The answer:  Of course!!  Nobody is saying that it will be easy -- and it will be easier for some companies than for others.  BTW, IDC is estimating $2.5 billion in IT services exports for China by 2008.  I guess IDC is figuring that China, will indeed, figure it out.
 
The NeoIT analyst cited project management as a problem for China's SIs.  Excuse me Mr. Kublanov, but there are some very capable PM (project managers) in China.  And guess what:  Many of them have pretty good English-language skills.  Yes, SIs in China could use more experienced PMs -- but IBM Global Services alone has more "experienced" PMs than the top 20 SIs in India combined.  Don't give me headcounts including a bunch of 20-something PMs a few years out of an IIT campus.  I said, "experienced," not "junior" PMs.  BearingPoint's Craig Franklin believes that BearingPoint has the necessary resources, including good PMs, to make a success of their ops in China.  Guess what, Mr. Kublanov:  Craig Franklin is right!!  BTW, IGS is expanding their operations in China, too.  And guess what:  Some of India's largest SIs are setting up shop in China, too.  (See http://tinyurl.com/5wyga and http://tinyurl.com/4x4f9 .)  There are also the Indian-Chinese JVs, like ZenSar and BroadenGate -- a superb business model with a superb management team.
 
A Silicon Valley-based company which has a development center in India is eyeing China because the country "has the best combination of cost advantage and supply of strong engineers."  (Quote from Marc Herbert, VP, Sierra Atlantic.)  True.  Cost Advantage + Supply of Strong Engineers = China (NOT India).  Market access is also a key factor in opening a development center in China, which is what IBM has been touting for a while.  The two "negatives" to using offshoring services in China cited by Marc Herbert are real, however:  A language barrier and government bureaucracy.  Yet, the bureaucracy issues can be overcome (ask me how) and the language barriers are nil in certain cases (ask me where).
 
There was an article on Kingdee featured in today's issue of Investor's Business Daily.  (See http://tinyurl.com/4qzjt , although IBD doesn't keep their articles up for free viewing for very long.  Matter of fact, this posting is going out before most Americans will wake up; hence, many readers in China are reading about the IBD article before most Americans.  It's currently a bit past 3 am on the West Coast, 6 am on the East Coast.)
 
It's a good article, but a bit confusing.  Kingdee's chief strategic officer is claiming that "(Kingdee) can find alliances to help these U.S. companies tap the Chinese market and vice versa" with a focus on "channel partners."  However, something doesn't make sense.  Kingdee competes with a lot of these same companies.  Is Kingdee really going to help Bamboo or Achievo?  I'd be surprised to see this happen.  It will be interesting to see if Kingdee can pull this off.  This seems to go beyond any notion of coopetition into a bit of sillyness and wishful thinking.
 
Tidbits on IT Outsourcing
 
U.S. financial services firms imported US$1 billion in application development from offshore locations in 2003.  It's still the best sector for IT outsourcing, although India has a commanding lead and the financial systems in China are radically different; hence, a tougher market to leverage with domestic experience.  (See http://tinyurl.com/5bqsq .)
 
Finally, outsourcing "transforms" India (see http://tinyurl.com/45kx3) and Bangalore tops Indian growth, with a lot of biotech growth, too (see http://shorl.com/fyprojilasuli ) -- similar to Shenzhen, which has a growing software, telecommunications and biotech base.
 
Cheers,
 
David Scott Lewis
President & Principal Analyst
IT E-Strategies, Inc.
Menlo Park, CA & Qingdao, China
http://www.itestrategies.com (current blog postings optimized for MSIE6.x)
http://tinyurl.com/2r3pa (access to blog content archives in China)
http://tinyurl.com/2azkh (current blog postings for viewing in other browsers and for access to blog content archives in the US & ROW)
http://tinyurl.com/2hg2e (AvantGo channel)
 
To automatically subscribe click on http://tinyurl.com/388yf .
 

Monday, July 12, 2004

[news] ERP in China

Monday, July 12, 2004
Dateline: China
 
In this posting, I'd like to address something that is seemingly a bit mundane:  ERP in China. 
 
Two articles in the current issue of the Communications of the ACM (CACM) caught my eye.  The first, titled "Why Western Vendors Don't Dominate China's ERP Market" is a good read.  (See http://tinyurl.com/27w9d .)  After reading this article, it's safe to say that Bamboo Networks (especially with their .NET ERP solution, which is something even Microsoft doesn't have), Kingdee, UFSoft and a few other domestic ERP vendors don't have much to fear from the "globals" -- although SAP and Oracle collectively hold about 25% of the market, which isn't bad.  Textbook blunders on the part of (mostly American) software vendors.  To request a copy of this article click on http://tinyurl.com/28eat .
 
The other article is titled, "ERP in China: One Package, Two Profiles."  (See http://tinyurl.com/2r45p .)  According to this paper, more than 1,000 Chinese sites had an ERP system by the end of 2001, costing billions of dollars.  Nearly 300 were on SAP.  (The figures differ slightly from the above cited CACM paper.)  ERP sales in China are projected to triple in five years from a US$1 billion base in 2002.  (Note:  I'm not sure if the author meant through 2007 or 2009.)  A good quote regarding partnering opportunities:  "With China's accession to the World Trade Organization, many multinational enterprises are rushing to establish operations in China and/or interact with Chinese business partners."  (My emphasis.)  For those on this list attempting to attract foreign direct investment, read the part which says, "establish operations in China."
 
The paper noted that although ERP projects in China rarely hit even ECO/ECN-adjusted delivery schedules, they rarely exceed the planned budget.  (In contrast to the States where ERP is almost always late AND over budget.  In the States, taking on an ERP project is akin to playing Russian Roulette.)  The article goes on to mention eight differences between ERP projects in state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and private ventures.  The findings demonstrate that when it comes to ERP projects, private ventures in China are very similar to private ventures in the States.  SOEs act like, well, SOEs:  Bureaucratic nightmares galore.  To request a copy of this article click on http://tinyurl.com/2eve2 .
 
There is another good article in the July issue of CACM:  "Demystifying Integration," which includes a listing of and brief take on dozens of domain-independent and -dependent standards and specifications for application integration.  Good stuff for a systems integrator.  To request a copy of this article click on http://tinyurl.com/3ysvx .
 
Tidbits on Enterprise Software
 
What does the CEO of a systems integrator dream about?  How about being one of the first companies to partner with a BEA or Siebel?  (When I thought about this, all choices seemed rather awful!!  )
 
Need some help finding the next BEA?  Turn to the AlwaysOn Network 100.  For perspective, see http://tinyurl.com/23p3u .  Last year's winners included several companies that IPO'd (including Salesforce.com, Opera), companies in line to IPO (including Google, RightNow) and several other hot companies.  Frankly, their record so far is the best I've seen (albeit it's still a bit too early to draw any firm conclusions).  For a listing of this year's winners (to be announced this upcoming week at Stanford -- Go Cardinal!), see http://tinyurl.com/25j9s .  If I had the time (which I don't), I'd go through this list with a fine-tooth comb.  IMHO, it's better than the listing of presenters at Enterprise Outlook or DEMO ... although the DEMO companies are a lot more fun!!.
 
Another list worth reviewing is Forrester's selection of the best Web design firms.  (See http://tinyurl.com/3bq5z .)  Critical Mass, AGENCY.COM and SBI.Razorfish take top honors.  Everyone tends to look toward the top 500 systems integrators in the States for partnering opportunities.  However, don't discount the elite among the U.S. Web design firms.  Many compete in an extremely cost conscious environment where much less expensive Java programming from a partner in China could be a win-win for all three parties:  The SI in China, the Web design firm in the States, and the U.S. client.
 
Cheers,
 
David Scott Lewis
President & Principal Analyst
IT E-Strategies, Inc.
Menlo Park, CA & Qingdao, China
 
To automatically subscribe click on http://tinyurl.com/388yf .
 

Sunday, July 11, 2004

[news] Highlights from The McKinsey Global Survey of Business Executives, July 2004

Saturday, July 10, 2004
Dateline: China
 
The new McKinsey Global Survey of Business Executives was published late last week.  (See http://tinyurl.com/yv97f .)  Nothing earthshaking, but several items worth noting.
 
"India wins in talent and R&D."  What this means, I think (it really isn't very clear), is that to know India is to love India (I'm paraphrasing, of course) -- and India beats China as a better source for knowledge workers.  Within the exception of APAC execs, "more executives of large companies say that they plan to invest in R&D facilities in India than in China."  Frankly, this doesn't have to be the case and it simply points to the fact that the "the powers that be" in China need to make a better case for R&D sourcing in China.  I can keep making this claim until I'm blue in the face, but I can't be the only talking head pushing for China.  However, there doesn't seem to be a lot of faith in India's new government by anyone (well, except for Indians).  Hmmm ...
 
"China has its admirers."  Are they referring to me?    Well, not everyone is an admirer according to the McKinsey survey.  One major divergence between execs in China and North American execs is that the Chinese nationals have a lot of faith in their government; conversely, North American execs have almost no faith in the Chinese government:  95% to 7% respectively.  North American execs are more upbeat about India.  Nevertheless, China still gets the lion's share of foreign direct investment, even compared to India.  What's interesting, though, is that North American execs are "the least confident -- and least interested (in China)."  Not the best news.
 
Tidbits on Outsourcing
 
According to a recent DiamondCluster survey, 26% of buyers of outsourcing services were dissatisfied with their outsourcing efforts and 21% said they had prematurely terminated an outsourcing arrangement in the past 12 months.
 
The same article (see http://tinyurl.com/35zfe ) also noted a rule of thumb for contract management staff sizing:  Five to six employees on the client side for every 100 people that are assigned to an engagement by the supplier.
 
In another article, Gartner claimed that 90% of offshoring revs go to India, with Ireland as its main competitor.  (However, this might be heavily biased toward BPO.)  "China and Russia currently lack the resources or infrastructure to really challenge India, according to the analyst house."  Funny, but Gartner has done work with the the software industry promotional agencies in Shanghai and Dalian.  Perhaps they wore blinders during their visit:  Clearly there are at least four "cities of excellence" in China, i.e., Shanghai, Dalian, Shenzhen and Beijing.  To brush aside the "cities of excellence" while branding China in a negative light is simply irresponsible.  Gartner should know better -- if this is what Gartner really said.  (See http://tinyurl.com/3hnd7 .)
 
Cheers,
 
David Scott Lewis
President & Principal Analyst
IT E-Strategies, Inc.
Menlo Park, CA & Qingdao, China

Saturday, July 10, 2004

[news] Chinasoft Does the NASDAQ Dance

Friday, July 9, 2004
Dateline: China
 
This news is several days old, so by now it's ancient history.  (See http://tinyurl.com/2e492 , courtesy of Pacific Epoch.)  But just in case you didn't catch it, CS&S's outsourcing arm (Chinasoft Resources) might list on NASDAQ.  This will be interesting to watch.  Comparisons to India's systems integrators (SIs) traded on NASDAQ are likely; however, comparing India's SIs to China's SIs is like comparing apples to oranges (or, dare I say, filet mignon to ground beef -- alas, McDonald's has had a lot more success than any steak house chain).  One down, 28 (or 46) more to go?
 
Cheers,
 
David Scott Lewis
President & Principal Analyst
IT E-Strategies, Inc.
Menlo Park, CA & Qingdao, China

Friday, July 09, 2004

[feedback requested] "The Golden Triangle": The U.S., India & China -- The Global IT Powers?

Friday, July 9, 2004
Dateline: China
 
Among the articles I'm writing is a piece on what is commonly referred to as "The Golden Triangle":  The United States, India, China (the acronym "USIC" sounds better than the alternatives, hence the ordering).
 
I'd like to include some quotes and since senior execs from most of the leading SIs in China read this blog, I'd like you to chime in and send me your thoughts.  (Feel free to send them in Mandarin.)  BTW, anyone reading this message/posting is free to chime in, but please be sure to provide your title and company information along with your name.  Also, please reply via a corporate account, not a Web-based e-mail account.
 
My basic premise is that the Golden Triangle countries will be the most significant force in the IT sector for at least the next twenty years, with an emergence of virtual corporations spanning all three countries.  Not surprisingly, Lee Quan Yu seems to think that Singapore will be a key link in this equation.  Although I think very highly of Singers, I think they're irrelevant.  I also think that Malaysia and the Philippines will be marginalized over the next twenty years.  I'll go so far as to say that South Korea and even Japan will become much less important relative to India and China.  (Controversy makes for good press.  )  Samsung may remain a significant force, perhaps becoming the only company in the Koreas worth noting.  Japan will remain a regional economic superpower, but I foresee China and India surpassing the importance of Japan in the IT sector.  (In some ways, I feel that Japan is going to become increasingly isolated.  However, the Japanese have a knack for adapting to new circumstances and their current economic power will sustain them for decades to come -- with a potential reversal of fortune around 2050, especially since they'll be the first large country to deal with the problems associated with the inverse pyramid of a homogeneous population.  Unless China and India can grow fast -- VERY fast -- this same situation might lead to their eventual doom circa 2060-2070.)
 
Another premise is that Europe will become increasingly irrelevant and that the current interest in the Czech Republic, Russia and other Eastern European countries for IT outsourcing (ITO) is merely a passing fad on the global scene -- although significant for a European hegemony.
 
I don't want to get too pie-in-the-sky about this stuff.  My focus is really on the next three to five years, not really on the next twenty or fifty years.  Futures, such as the possibility of a joint U.S.-India-China tridominium military alliance, are fascinating stuff (and I regularly read the scholarly journal, Futures -- it's not a SF <science fiction> rag, it's an academic research journal).  But my take is more along the lines of the journal, Technology Forecasting & Social Change -- but with a near(er)-term perspective than most of the papers in TF&SC.
 
So, what are your thoughts?  Will the U.S., India and/or China come to dominate the IT industry?  (Or, have they already?)  What about the idea of virtual corporations, especially systems integrators and software vendors, spanning all three countries -- but also spanning within the Golden Triangle at the expense of Europe and even Japan?  And what about India and China versus Japan and South Korea -- and versus Malaysia and the Philippines?  Or, is it really the U.S. and India WITHOUT China, given the commonality of language and legal systems (and how quickly can China "upgrade" its legal systems and lack of English skills -- or does this provide opportunities in specific parts of China, e.g., Shenzhen and Hong Kong, where English-language skills among IT professionals are much more common)?  Or, is it really India and China WITHOUT the States, with India and China forming some sort of (un)spoken bi-lateral economic codominium?
 
Remember, however, to focus your comments on the next five years -- and on the IT sector.  If you want to speculate about long(er)-term futures, please do so, but explicitly state the time frame in your comments.  (Unless told otherwise, I'll assume that all comments are about developments over the next five years.)  Also, let me know if anything you say is off the record; I'll be assuming the entire content of each response is on the record.  For example, I wouldn't be surprised to receive many negative comments regarding Europe's future prospects, but OFF-the-record comments.
 
For this particular response, please do NOT hit "Reply" to this message.  Instead, click on http://tinyurl.com/2erxk and send me your viewpoints.
 
Cheers,
 
David Scott Lewis
President & Principal Analyst
IT E-Strategies, Inc.
Menlo Park, CA & Qingdao, China (and I guess I need an address in India, too!!  )

[news] A Special Report on Business Intelligence

Thursday, July 8, 2004
Dateline: China
 
One of my favorite industry trades, Computerworld, recently published a special report on business intelligence (BI).  (See http://tinyurl.com/2w8j2 .)  As regular readers of this blog know, I'm hot, hot and hotter on BI.  Not only are BI apps booming in their own right, but BI also provides an open door into other structured data apps (e.g., ERP and SCM).  Also, there is a burgeoning number of apps requiring both BI and knowledge management (KM) solutions, providing a host of new opportunities.  (For now, think of BI for structured data and KM for unstructured data.  But the lines between KM and BI are blurring.)
 
The Computerworld report includes an introduction to BI titled, "BI for the Masses," an introduction to Web harvesting, and a superb article on text mining; there are several online exclusives as well.  In this post, I'm going to focus on an article titled, "Predictions for BI's Future," by providing excerpts with commentary.  As usual, items in bold are MY emphasis; items in red are MY commentary.
 
Embedded BI.  "Over the next four to six years, BI systems will become embedded in small, mobile devices, such as manufacturing sensors and PDAs in the field, which in turn will be linked to more centralized systems." -- Erik Thomsen, distinguished scientist, Hyperion Solutions Corp., Sunnyvale, Calif.
 
PB DM (petabyte data mining).  "Within three years, companies and governmental agencies will be able to successfully run analytics within a centralized data warehouse containing 1 petabyte or more of data -- without performance limitations." -- Dave Schrader, technology futurist, Teradata, a division of NCR Corp., El Segundo, Calif.
 
HPC to the rescue!  "Within the next two to three years, high-performance computing technology used by scientific and engineering communities and national R&D labs will make its way into mainstream business for high-performance business analytics. This transition will be driven by the growing volume of complex data and the pressing need for companies to use forecasting and predictive analytics to minimize risk and maximize profit-generating opportunities." -- Phil Fraher, chief operating officer, Visual Numerics Inc., San Ramon, Calif.
 
BI meets AI.  "In the near future, business leaders will manage by exception, and automated systems will handle significant loads of routine tasks." -- Mike Covert, chief operating officer, Infinis Inc., Columbus, Ohio
 
Visualization.  "Over the next two to three years, BI systems will automatically suggest appropriate visualizations, which in turn will dramatically increase the use of visualization and our understanding of complex relationships." -- Erik Thomsen, distinguished scientist, Hyperion Solutions
 
BI + BPM + BAM.  "Businesses need more than a rearview mirror to drive their business forward into the next era. A new category of intelligence tools will emerge over the next two to three years that combines business process management, business activity monitoring (BAM) and business intelligence to enable the "actively managed enterprise." This will combine the scorecards and rearview-analysis capabilities of BI with the real-time, event-driven analysis of BAM and feed that information into automated business processes for on-the-fly steering of the business towards scorecard goals. This will exponentially elevate the speed at which businesses are able to operate, adapt and make critical decisions." -- Tim Wolters, chief architect of business activity monitoring solutions, webMethods Inc., Fairfax, Va.
 
Bottom line:  Go to a BI-related ACM or IEEE CS conference and you'll hear a lot of presentations on all of the apps described above.  It's where the rubber meets the road:  This stuff is real!!  However, it's important to differentiate "real" BI with much more simplistic reporting software (like a good "chunk" of the so-called BI solutions provided by Business Objects, Cognos and even Microsoft -- via their recent acquisition of ActiveViews).
 
A BI Site to Review
 
Last week I came across a paper published in the current issue of the Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems.  In this paper the project called "Data Mining and Decision Support for Business Competitiveness: A European Virtual Enterprise" (SolEuNet) is used as a case study and "the source of lessons learned."  The paper provides a link to the SolEuNet Web site (see http://tinyurl.com/3x5vo ); at the SolEuNet site I found a wealth of case studies with supporting technical documents on leading-edge BI apps (see, for example, Workpackage 7 on "Combining Data Mining and Decision Support with Information Systems" at http://tinyurl.com/yqkqm ).  Remember, strategy consulting isn't merely about comparing product specs (regardless what the IT advisory services may say).
 
The Gartner Conference on BI
 
I got my hands on three i-banking analyst reviews of the Gartner BI conference.  The Morgan Stanley report (dated 27 April) noted that customer activity levels appeared to be strong and "many seem to be taking a more strategic approach to BI, resulting in the emergence of larger transactions."  (My emphasis.)  Corporate performance management (CPM) is driving some of the larger deals, with Cognos and Hyperion taking the lead.  Evidently, systems integrators (SIs) are getting religion and developing collaterals around CPM messaging.  RBC Dominion Securities produced a more in-depth report (dated 29 April) and noted the following:
  • Gartner expects the market to accelerate in 2004.
  • The ETL (extraction, transformation, and load) market will flatten (finally).
  • CPM is hot.  "Hyperion, Cognos, and SAS appeared to be the best positioned non-ERP vendors to capitalize on the CPM market opportunity."  However, "(they) believe that SAP is the best-positioned large enterprise software vendor to execute in both the BI and CPM market ..."
  • Finally, the Gartner BI conference itself was hot, with 973 attendees, an increase in attendance of 70% over last year.
UBS chimed in with their own report (dated 30 April), which in some ways was a bit more technical than the other two reports cited above.  UBS noted that heterogeneous environments require independent tools (e.g., it is very difficult to get heterogeneous data into an ERP data warehouse <DW>).  Gartner's rule of thumb is that an ERP-derived BI/DW solution should be on the short-list only if more than 60% of an organization's BI data resides within that single app vendorUBS also noted that the importance of BI is leading to the formation of BI competency centers.  They also believe that SAP and Microsoft remain significant long-term threats to the independent software vendors such as Cognos and Business Objects.  BTW, all three reports seemed a bit down on Business Objects.
 
Another Computerworld feature on BI
 
Sometimes advertorials can be a good thing.  A case in point is the 26 April issue of Computerworld which provides a link to a new, six page Computerworld White Paper on BI.  The paper is titled, "Charting the Course: A Guide to Evaluating Business Intelligence Products"; it's a good, practical read.  Tactical, product spec advice and guidelines, but still a good read.  The PDF can be found at http://tinyurl.com/2gt3d .
 
Recent Tidbits on BI
 
The New Straits Times (Malaysia) via Asia Africa Intelligence Wire reported on 24 June that SAS "expects the BI market in Asia to register double-digit growth for the next five years.  (Don Cooper Williams, director of marketing and alliances for SAS Asia-Pacific) cites a recent report from research house International Data Corp, which predicts that BI software market in the region (excluding Japan) to grow by 12 per cent this year, up from 7.5 per cent in 2003."  Note to SIs in China:  BI isn't just hot in the States; leverage your skills for serving the U.S. market and the domestic market.
 
From the channel, India Business Insight (also via Asia Africa Intelligence Wire) on 31 May announced that "Business Objects has entered into a long-standing systems integrator agreement with Wipro Infotech (WI) to provide business intelligence (BI) solutions to customers."  Note to SIs in China:  Don't be left without a dance partner.
 
Additional Articles for Review
 
I did a quick scan of trade lit and found a few articles worth reading.  First, the March-April issue of Financial Executive talks about CPM -- Corporate Performance Management -- as it relates to BI.  The May issue of Insurance & Technology takes a vertical look at BI (rather basic apps), as does the April issue of Business Credit.  Always think verticals.
 
A Final Wrap (or Should I Say, "Rap"?)
 
Back to Computerworld.  More specifically, see the 29 March issue of Computerworld.  According to a survey conducted by IBM Business Consulting Services, BI is a high priority on the plate of C-level execs.  In a Computerworld poll, 39% of IT executives listed business intelligence projects as their most critical IT projects.  By 2005, market research firm IDC projects that the worldwide market for business intelligence software will total about $6 billion -- up from $2.5 billion in 2003 -- signaling a major increase in business intelligence projects.  IT executives say the skills they need on business intelligence projects include systems integration, data modeling, database administration, data standardization and project management.
 
Cheers,
 
David Scott Lewis
President & Principal Analyst
IT E-Strategies, Inc.
Menlo Park, CA & Qingdao, China
http://www.itestrategies.com (current blog postings optimized for MSIE6.x)
http://tinyurl.com/2r3pa (access to blog content archives in China)
http://tinyurl.com/2azkh (current blog postings for viewing in other browsers and for access to blog content archives in the US & ROW)
http://tinyurl.com/2hg2e (AvantGo channel)
 
To automatically subscribe click on http://tinyurl.com/388yf .